📊 Unified Dashboard
Your current RAG strategy at a glance — pattern, readiness, cost, and pipeline priorities.
🎯 Recommended Pattern
—
Run the Recommender to get a suggestion.
📋 Readiness Score
—
Check your readiness above.
Prototype
💰 Estimated Monthly Cost
—
Adjust sliders in the Estimator tab.
⚡ Priority Pipeline Steps
Select a pattern to see priorities.
💡 Quick advice: Run the Recommender to get started.
📋 The 10 RAG Patterns
Click any pattern to expand — see use cases, trade‑offs, and when to use it.
🎯 Pattern Recommender
Answer 3 questions — get a tailored RAG pattern recommendation.
—
Your recommendation will appear here.
confidence: —
🔍 Pipeline Explorer
Click a step to see best practices, tools, and pitfalls — straight from the blueprint.
📄 Ingestion
✂️ Chunking
🔢 Embeddings
🗄️ Vector DB
🔍 Retrieval
🧠 Generation
Select a step above
Click on any pipeline step to see detailed guidance.
🏗️ Pattern Architecture View
Select a pattern to see which pipeline steps are critical (high/medium/low priority).
Ingestionmedium
Chunkinghigh
Embeddingshigh
Vector DBmedium
Retrievalhigh
Generationmedium
📊 Quick Comparison
Cost, latency, complexity, and best fit for each pattern.
| Pattern | Cost | Latency | Complexity | Best for |
⚡ Query Simulator
Type a question — see which RAG pattern would be triggered and why.
📋 RAG Readiness Checklist
Evaluate your organization's readiness to deploy RAG in production.
💰 Cost & Latency Estimator
Estimate monthly RAG costs and average latency based on your scale.
📖 Interactive Glossary
Click any term for a plain‑English definition pulled from the RAG blueprint.
Chunking
Breaking documents into pieces. Semantic chunking splits at topic shifts; hierarchical uses small + parent chunks for context.
Embeddings
Numerical vectors that represent the meaning of text. Used for semantic search to find relevant chunks.
Vector DB
Database optimized for storing and querying embeddings. Supports hybrid search (keyword + semantic).
Hybrid Search
Combines keyword matching (BM25) and semantic (vector) search. Outperforms either alone in production.
HyDE
Hypothetical Document Embeddings — the LLM generates a fake answer first, then uses that to search, bridging the query‑document gap.
CRAG
Corrective RAG — adds a quality gate after retrieval. If docs are low‑quality, it reformulates the query or falls back to web search.
Self‑RAG
The model generates reflection tokens to critique its own retrieval and reasoning in real‑time, ensuring high accuracy.
Agentic RAG
LLM acts as an orchestrator, deciding when to search, call APIs, or run code, looping until a sufficient answer is formed.
Graph RAG
Builds a knowledge graph over entities and relationships. Excels at multi‑hop questions that require connecting dots across documents.
Multimodal RAG
Uses vision models to generate text descriptions for images and tables at ingestion, making them searchable via text embeddings.